RESEARCH PAPER
Sport performance levels and somatotype classifications in females
More details
Hide details
1
School of Doctoral Studies, Hungarian University of Sports Science, Budapest, Hungary
2
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Miskolc, Miskolc, Hungary
Submission date: 2025-12-16
Final revision date: 2026-02-09
Acceptance date: 2026-02-23
Online publication date: 2026-03-02
Corresponding author
Andrea Lukács
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Miskolc, 3515 Miskolc-Egyetemváros, Hungary
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
The relationship between physique and athletic performance has been studied for decades, yet the relevance of somatotype compared to body composition indicators remains debated. This study aimed to examine morphological characteristics of female participants across different activity levels and to explore the extent to which somatotype and anthropometric traits differentiate performance groups.
Material and methods:
A total of 118 females aged 18 to 35 years participated, including 38% high-performance athletes, 25% recreational athletes, and 36% physically less active individuals. Anthropometric measurements were obtained, and somatotypes were classified using the Heath-Carter method. Statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS 28.0, applying non-parametric tests due to non-normal data distribution.
Results:
Somatotype distribution showed 36.4% endomorphic, 37.3% mesomorphic, 14.4% ectomorphic, and 11.9% central, with no significant association between somatotype and sport performance levels (χ²=11.036, p=0.087). In contrast, significant differences were found in skinfold thickness (p=0.002) and waist circumference (p=0.009), with high-performance athletes exhibiting lower values than recreational and less active individuals. No significant variation was observed in humerus and femur condylus widths.
Conclusions:
These findings suggest that body composition, rather than somatotype alone, plays a more relevant role in distinguishing performance levels, highlighting the importance of individualized, sport-specific assessments for training and talent identification.
REFERENCES (20)
1.
Carter JEL. The Heath-Carter anthropometric somatotype: instruction manual. San Diego (CA): Department of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University; 2002.
2.
Shahidi SH, Yalçın M, Holway FE. Anthropometric and somatotype characteristics of top elite Turkish national jumpers. Int J Kinanthropometry. 2023; 3(2): 45-55.
https://doi.org/10.34256/ijk23....
3.
Kamath S, Adhikari R, Bawari B, Easow J, Kale U, Wong FY, et al. Investigating anthropometric characteristics and somatotypes in elite Indian track and field athletes. Int J Kinanthropometry. 2024; 4(2): 33-43.
https://doi.org/10.34256/ijk24....
4.
Martínez-Mireles X, Nava-González EJ, López-Cabanillas Lomelí M. The shape of success: a scoping review of somatotype in modern elite athletes across various sports. Sports. 2025; 13(2): 38.
https://doi.org/10.3390/sports....
5.
Kutseryb T, Hrynkiv M, Vovkanych L, Muzyka F, Melnyk V. Anthropometric characteristic and body composition of female students involved in volleyball training. Anthropological Review. 2022; 85(4): 31-42.
https://doi.org/10.18778/1898-....
6.
Pérez Armendáriz ML, Adhikari R, Bawari B, Varamenti E, Pullinger SA. Anthropometric characteristics, somatotype, and body composition of Indian female combat sport athletes. Int J Kinanthropometry. 2023; 3(1): 109-117.
https://doi.org/10.34256/ijk23....
7.
González Macías ME, Flores J. Somatotype, anthropometric characteristics, body composition, and global flexibility range in artistic gymnasts and sport hoop athletes. PLoS One. 2024; 19(10): e0312555.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journa....
8.
Serebryakov V. Features of the somatotypological status of athletes of various sports specializations and qualifications. Ment Enlight Sci-Methodol J. 2024; 5(1): 185-189.
https://doi.org/10.37547/mesmj....
9.
Sakibaev K, Akimov EB, Nikolaidis PT, Knechtle B. Assessing the consistency between anthropometric method and bioelectrical impedance analysis when calculating Heath-Carter somatotype. J Electr Bioimpedance. 2025; 16(1): 99-106.
https://doi.org/10.2478/joeb-2....
10.
Esparza-Ros F, Vaquero-Cristóbal R. [Anthropometry: fundamentals for application and interpretation]. Murcia: UCAM Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia; 2023 (in Spanish).
11.
Ackland TR, Lohman TG, Sundgot-Borgen J, Maughan RJ, Meyer NL, Stewart AD, et al. Current status of body composition assessment in sport: review and position statement on behalf of the ad hoc research working group on body composition health and performance, under the auspices of the I.O.C. Medical Commission. Sports Med. 2012; 42(3): 227-249.
https://doi.org/10.2165/115971....
12.
Stewart A, Williams JH, editors. Kinanthropometry and exercise physiology. 5th ed. Abingdon: Routledge; 2023.
13.
Díaz-Martínez AS, Vaquero-Cristóbal R, Albalaedejo-Saura M, Esparza-Ros F. Effect of pre-season and in-season training on anthropometric variables, somatotype, body composition and body proportion in elite basketball players. Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1): 7537.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598....
14.
Ruscello B, Morganti G, De Fano A, Mancina F, Lunetta L, Di Mauro G, et al. Comparing the anthropometrics, body composition, and strength performance of male and female Italian breaking athletes: a pilot study. Sports. 2024; 12(7): 197.
https://doi.org/10.3390/sports....
15.
Baranauskas M, Kupčiūnaitė I, Lieponienė J, Stukas R. Dominant somatotype development in relation to body composition and dietary macronutrient intake among high‑performance athletes in water, cycling and combat sports. Nutrients. 2024; 16(10): 1493.
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu1610....
16.
Toskic L, Markovic M, Simenko J, Vidic V, Cikiriz N, Dopsaj M. Analysis of body composition in men and women with diverse training profiles: a cross-sectional study. Int. J. Morphol. 2024; 42(5): 1278-1287.
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-....
17.
Petri C, Campa F, Holway F, Pengue L, Arrones LS. ISAK-based anthropometric standards for elite male and female soccer players. Sports (Basel). 2024; 12(3): 69.
https://doi.org/10.3390/sports....
18.
Novoa-Vignau MF, Salas-Fraire O, Salas-Longoria K, Hernández-Suárez G, Menchaca-Pérez M. A comparison of anthropometric characteristics and somatotypes in a group of elite climbers, recreational climbers, and non-climbers. Med Univ. 2017; 19(75): 69-73.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmu.....
19.
Esteve‑Ibáñez H, Drehmer E, da Silva VS, Souza I, Silva DAS, Vieira F. Relationship of body composition and somatotype with physical activity level and nutrition knowledge in elite and non‑elite orienteering athletes. Nutrients. 2025; 17(4): 714.
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu1704....
20.
Campa F, Moon J, Petri C, Spataro F, Baroncini G, Faraone E, et al. Beyond somatotype categories: composition-based clustering of body types in young adults. Front. Physiol. 2025; 16: 1722899.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.....