PHYSICAL ACTIVITY OF SOCIAL AND PROFESSIONAL GROUPS / RESEARCH PAPER
VALIDITY OF THREE HIP-WORN PEDOMETERS FOR STEP COUNTS IN A LABORATORY SETTING
,
 
,
 
,
 
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Division of Physical Activity and Health, Department of Recreation, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye
 
2
Department of Exercise and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Başkent University, Ankara, Türkiye
 
3
Department of Coaching Education, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Hitit University, Çorum, Türkiye
 
4
Division of Sports Biomechanics and Motor Control, Department of Exercise and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye
 
5
Division of Movement and Training Sciences, Department of Exercise and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Hacettepe University, Türkiye
 
 
Submission date: 2022-10-10
 
 
Final revision date: 2022-12-30
 
 
Acceptance date: 2023-01-11
 
 
Publication date: 2023-01-24
 
 
Corresponding author
Ayda Karaca
Ayda Karaca, Division of Physical Activity and Health, Department of Recreation, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Hacettepe University, Beytepe Kampüsü, 06800 Çankaya/Ankara, Türkiye
 
 
Health Prob Civil. 2023;17(1):76-83
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background.:
Objectively measuring physical activity with a functional and inexpensive device is important in large-scale health research. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the validity of the Omron HJ-321 (HJ-321), Omron GoSmart HJ-112 (HJ-112), and Yamax SW200 Digiwalker (YX) for measuring step counts (SC) obtained from the sum of different speeds in a laboratory setting.

Material and methods.:
A total of 26 healthy males aged between 19 and 35 years (26.4±6.3 years) participated voluntarily. During the 10-minute treadmill protocol, the participants were asked to wear HJ-321 and HJ-112 pedometers on the right side and YX on both sides of their hips. The digital image processing code was written in MATLAB (R2013B) for calculating the actual step counts (ASC) with 100% accuracy. The SC for all the pedometers and ASC were recorded simultaneously.

Results.:
HJ-112 and YX have a small Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) of <10%, while the HJ-321 showed a high MAPE of >10%. There was a significant correlation between the ASC and the HJ-112, and the YX worn both on right and left sides (respectively, ICC and 95%CI: 0.583 (0.069, 0.813); 0.638 (0.193, 0.838); 0.516 (-0.079, 0.783)). However, a significant correlation was not found for the HJ-321 (0.025 (-1.212, 0.570)).

Conclusions.:
This study shows that the HJ-112 and YX on both sides are valid for measuring total step count during 10 minutes of walking and running in a laboratory setting.
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Lee JA, Williams SM, Brown DD, Laurson KR. Concurrent validation of the Actigraph gt3x+, Polar Active accelerometer, Omron HJ-720 and Yamax Digiwalker SW-701 pedometer step counts in lab-based and free-living settings. J Sports Sci. 2015; 33(10): 991-1000. https://doi.org/10.1080/026404....
 
2.
Jones D, Crossley K, Dascombe B, Hart HF, Kemp J. Validity and reliability of the Fitbit Flex™ and Actigraph GT3X+ at jogging and running speeds. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2018; 13(5): 860. https://doi.org/10.26603/ijspt....
 
3.
Evenson KR, Goto MM, Furberg RD. Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015; 12(1): 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966....
 
4.
Balmain BN, Tuttle N, Bailey J, Cheng K, Duryea M, Houlihan J, et al. Using smart socks to detect step-count at slow walking speeds in healthy adults. Int J Sports Med. 2019; 40(02): 133-138. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0732....
 
5.
Puppala VK, Hofeld BC, Anger A, Tyagi S, Strath SJ, Fox J, et al. Pacemaker detected active minutes are superior to pedometer-based step counts in measuring the response to physical activity counseling in sedentary older adults. BMC Geriatr. 2020; 20(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877....
 
6.
Cruz J, Brooks D, Marques A. Accuracy of piezoelectric pedometer and accelerometer step counts. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2016; 57(4): 426-433. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022....
 
7.
Behrens TK, Dinger MK. Comparisons of accelerometer and pedometer determined steps in free living samples. J Phys Act Health. 2011; 8(3): 390-397. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.8....
 
8.
Zhu W, Lee M. Invariance of wearing location of Omron-BI pedometers: a validation study. J Phys Act Health. 2010; 7(6): 706-717. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.7....
 
9.
Abel MG, Hannon JC, Eisenman PA, Ransdell LB, Pett M, Williams DP. Waist circumference, pedometer placement, and step-counting accuracy in youth. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2009; 80(3): 434-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/027013....
 
10.
Kumahara H, Ayabe M, Ichibakase M, Tashima A, Chiwata M, Takashi T. Validity of activity monitors worn at multiple nontraditional locations under controlled and free-living conditions in young adult women. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2015; 40(5): 448-456. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2....
 
11.
Melanson EL, Knoll JR, Bell ML, Donahoo WT, Hill J, Nysse LJ, et al. Commercially available pedometers: considerations for accurate step counting. Prev Med. 2004; 39(2): 361-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypme....
 
12.
Hickey A, John D, Sasaki JE, Mavilia M, Freedson P. Validity of activity monitor step detection is related to movement patterns. J Phys Act Health. 2016; 13(2): 145-153. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2....
 
13.
Hills AP, Mokhtar N, Byrne NM. Assessment of physical activity and energy expenditure: an overview of objective measures. Front Nutr. 2014; 1: 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2....
 
14.
Giannakidou DM, Kambas A, Ageloussis N, Fatouros I, Christoforidis C, Venetsanou F, et al. The validity of two Omron pedometers during treadmill walking is speed dependent. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012; 112(1): 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421....
 
15.
Chia M. Measurement accuracy of a motıon sensor used to estımate step count. Acta Kinesiol. 2019; 13(1): 5-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221....
 
16.
Le Masurier GC, Tudor-Locke C. Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer accuracy under controlled conditions. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35(5): 867-71. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS....
 
17.
Kooiman TJ, Dontje ML, Sprenger SR, Krijnen WP, Van der Schans CP, de Groot M. Reliability and validity of ten consumer activity trackers. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2015; 7(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102....
 
18.
Huang Y, Xu J, Yu B, Shull PB. Validity of FitBit, Jawbone UP, Nike+ and other wearable devices for level and stair walking. Gait Posture. 2016; 48: 36-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gait....
 
19.
Hasson RE, Haller J, Pober DM, Staudenmayer J, Freedson PS. Validity of the Omron HJ-112 pedometer during treadmill walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009; 41(4): 805-809. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b....
 
20.
Battenberg AK, Donohoe S, Robertson N, Schmalzried TP. The accuracy of personal activity monitoring devices. Semin Arthroplasty. 2017; 28(2): 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sart....
 
21.
Omron Healthcare. Omron Instruction Manual Pedometer Model: HJ-321 2012 [Internet]. Lake Forest, IL: Omron Healthcare [access 2022 Apr 10]. Available from: https://omronhealthcare.com/wp....
 
22.
Omron Healthcare. Omron instruction manual Gosmart Pocket Pedometer Model HJ-112 2010 [Internet]. Lake Forest, IL: Omron Healthcare [access 2022 Apr 10]. Available from: https://omronhealthcare.com/wp....
 
23.
Vanroy C, Vissers D, Cras P, Beyne S, Feys H, Vanlandewijck Y, et al. Physical activity monitoring in stroke: SenseWear Pro2 activity accelerometer versus Yamax Digi-Walker.
 
24.
SW-200 pedometer. Disabil Rehabil. 2014; 36(20): 1695-703. https://doi.org/10.3109/096382....
 
25.
Fokkema T, Kooiman T, Krijnen WP, Van der Schans CP, De Groot M. Reliability and validity of ten consumer activity trackers depend on walking speed. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017; 49(4): 793-800. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.00....
 
26.
Maes I, Ketels M, Van Dyck D, Clays E. The occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire (OSPAQ): a validation study with accelerometer-assessed measures. BMC Public Health. 2020; 20(1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889....
 
27.
Nelson MB, Kaminsky LA, Dickin DC, Montoye AH. Validity of consumer-based physical activity monitors for specific activity types. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016; 48(8): 1619-28. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.00....
 
28.
Schneider PL, Crouter SE, Bassett DR. Pedometer measures of free-living physical activity: comparison of 13 models. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004; 36(2): 331-335. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS....
 
29.
Tudor-Locke C, Ainsworth BE, Thompson RW, Matthews CE. Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer measures of free-living physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002; 34(12): 2045-2051. https://doi.org/10.1097/000057....
 
30.
Colley RC, Barnes JD, Leblanc AG, Borghese M, Boyer C, Tremblay MS. Validity of the SC-StepMX pedometer during treadmill walking and running. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2013; 38(5): 520-524. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2....
 
eISSN:2354-0265
ISSN:2353-6942
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top