OTHER / REVIEW PAPER
Characteristics as well as past and present possibilities of using microorganisms listed on the CDC list a of biological agents in bioterrorist attacks
 
More details
Hide details
1
Pope John Paul II State School of Higher Education in Biała Podlaska, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2017-04-20
 
 
Final revision date: 2017-05-23
 
 
Acceptance date: 2017-05-30
 
 
Publication date: 2018-10-13
 
 
Health Prob Civil. 2019;13(1):76-82
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The study aims at characterising four bacterial infectious agents listed on the CDC A list, i.e. Anthrax (Bacillus anthracis), plague (Yersinia pestis), botulism (Clostridium botulinum) and tularemia (Francisella tularensis) as potential tools used in a bioterrorist attack causing diseases. The paper also includes information on their occurrence in Poland and the EU. Despite the real threat of terrorism in the 21st century and large-scale activities aimed at limiting the occurrence of this phenomenon, it should be borne in mind that pathogens listed on the CDC list A, although spotted primarily in animals, can be a real threat to people’s health and life. Among the discussed microorganisms, only Francisella tularensis and Clostridium botulinum cause sporadic diseases in Poland; however, it should be remembered that both Bacillus anthracis, occurring in Europe, and Yersinia pestis, occurring in Asia and Africa, can pose real threats to human health and life not only in natural infections, but when used as a biological weapon.
REFERENCES (24)
1.
Puzanowska B, Czauż-Andrzejuk A. [Bioterrorism]. Przegląd epidemiologiczny. 2001; 55: 379-386 (in Polish).
 
2.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Biological and chemical terrorism: strategic plan for preparedness and response - recommendations of the CDC strategic planning workgroup. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep MMWR. 2000; 49: 1–14.
 
3.
Janeczek M, Chrószcz A, Ożóg T. [The use of biological and chemical weapons in Ancient World and the role of epidemic diseases in the history]. Życie Weterynaryjne. 2010; 85: 230-233 (in Polish).
 
4.
Zajkowska J, Hermanowska-Szpakowicz T. [Anthrax as biowarfare weapon]. Medycyna Pracy. 2002; 2: 167- 172 (in Polish).
 
5.
Zieliński KW. [Pathology of injures and illnesses caused by modern weapons in warfare and terrorism]. Warszawa: MON; 2010 (in Polish).
 
6.
Bińczycka-Anholcer M, Imiołek A. [Bioterrorism as a form of modern terrorism]. Hygeia Public Health. 2011; 3: 327 (in Polish).
 
7.
Chomiczewski K. [Animal pathogens as a biological weapon]. Przegląd epidemiologiczny. 2003; 57: 355-61 (in Polish).
 
8.
Meselson M, Guillemin J, Hugh-Jones M, Langmuir A, Popova I, Shelokov A, et al. Sverdlovsk anthrax outbreak of 1979. Science. 1994; 266: 1202–08. https://doi.org/10.1126/scienc....
 
9.
Rao SS, Mohan KV, Atreya CD. Detection technologies for Bacillus anthracis: prospects and challenges. J Microbiol Methods. 2010; 82(1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mime....
 
10.
Bouzianas DG. Potential biological targets of Bacillus anthracis in anti-infective approaches against the threat of bioterrorism. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2007; 4: 665-84. https://doi.org/10.1586/147872....
 
11.
Derzelle S, Thierry S. Genetic diversity of Bacillus anthracis in Europe: genotyping methods in forensic and epidemiologic investigations. Biosecur Bioterror. 2013; 1: 166-76. https://doi.org/10.1089/bsp.20....
 
12.
European Food Safety Authority, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2015. EFSA Journal. 2016; 14(12): e04634. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa....
 
13.
Kukier E, Kwiatek K, Grenda T, Goldsztejn M, Dębski J. [Botulism - pathogenesis and diagnostics of the disease]. Życie Weterynaryjne, 2015; 90: 163-166 (in Polish).
 
14.
Dembek ZF, Smith LA, Rusnak JM. Botulism: cause, effects, diagnosis, clinical and laboratory identification, and treatment modalities. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2007; 1: 122-34. https://doi.org/10.1097/DMP.0b....
 
15.
Janofsky M. Looking for motives in plague case. New York Times. May 24, 1995: A12.
 
16.
Bennett JM, Hollister CW. Medieval Europe: A Short History. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2006. p. 326.
 
17.
Barras V, Greub G. History of biological warfare and bioterrorism. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014; 6: 497-502. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-0....
 
18.
Christian MD. Biowarfare and bioterrorism. Crit Care Clin. 2013; 3: 717-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccc.....
 
19.
Lõhmus M, Janse I, van de Goot F, van Rotterdam BJ. Rodents as potential couriers for bioterrorism agents. Biosecur Bioterror. 2013; 1: 247-57. https://doi.org/10.1089/bsp.20....
 
20.
Prentice MB, Rahalison L. Plague. Lancet. 2007; 369(9568): 1196-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-....
 
21.
Robinson-Dunn B. The microbiology laboratory’s role in response to bioterrorism. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002; 3: 291-4.
 
22.
Kłapeć T, Cholewa A. [Tularemia – a still dangerous zoonosis]. Medycyna Ogólna. Nauki o Zdrowiu. 2011; 3: 155-160 (in Polish).
 
23.
Maurin M, Gyuranecz M. Tularaemia: clinical aspects in Europe. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016; 1: 113-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-....
 
24.
Wagar E. Bioterrorism and the role of the clinical microbiology laboratory. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016; 29; 175- 89. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00....
 
eISSN:2354-0265
ISSN:2353-6942
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top