RESEARCH PAPER
EMPATHY TOWARD WHEELCHAIR USERS AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: CROSS-NATIONAL DIFFERENCES
AND CORRELATES
More details
Hide details
1
Malopolska Occupational Medicine Center, Krakow, Poland
2
Department of Nursing, International Academy of Applied Sciences in Lomza, Poland
3
Faculty of Health Sciences, Catholic University in Ružomberok, Slovakia
4
Institute of Biology System and Genetic Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
5
Department of Foreign Languages, Faculty of Medicine with the Division of Dentistry and Division of Medical Education in English, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland
6
Faculty of Physical Education and Tourism, Eastern European University of Applied Sciences in Bialystok, Białystok, Poland
7
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, John Paul II University in Biała Podlaska, Poland
Submission date: 2025-11-01
Final revision date: 2025-11-26
Acceptance date: 2025-11-26
Online publication date: 2025-12-02
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
Empathy is a key driver of social inclusion for wheelchair users, especially in regions affected by the war in Ukraine. This study compared empathy levels and profiles among university students in Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, Ukraine, and Belarus, considering individual characteristics, contact with wheelchair users, and broader sociocultural factors.
Material and methods:
A multicenter cross sectional online survey (2024-2025) included 4,474 medical and non medical students. Empathy was assessed using the KRE II scale (33 items; Cronbach’s α=0.852) across five subscales; scores were standardized (0-3). A questionnaire collected sociodemographic data and frequency of contact with wheelchair users. Non parametric statistics were applied with Benjamini-Hochberg corrections.
Results:
The highest standardized medians were for “Sympathizing” (Syndrome I; Me=2.0/3) and “Sensitivity” (III; 1.9/3), and the lowest for “Co suffering” (II; 1.7/3) and “Pure Empathy” (V; 1.7/3). Regular contact with wheelchair users (29.6% overall; 67.0% in Ukraine) was associated with higher total KRE II scores (ρ=0.30, p<0.001). Cross national differences were greatest for “Readiness to Sacrifice” (IV; H=220, p<0.001; η²=0.05), with Ukrainian students showing the highest medians.
Conclusions:
Empathy profiles differ by country, shaped by social context and contact with wheelchair users. Developing empathic competencies and supportive educational environments is crucial for academic inclusion of students with disabilities.
REFERENCES (51)
1.
Freer JRR. Students’ attitudes toward disability: a systematic literature review (2012-2019). International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2023; 27(5): 652-670.
https://doi.org/10.1080/136031....
2.
Szumski G, Smogorzewska J, Grygiel P. Attitudes of students toward people with disabilities, moral identity and inclusive education: a two-level analysis. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2020; 102: 103685.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd....
3.
European Commission. Union of equality: strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities 2021-2030 [Internet]. Brussels: European Commission; 2021 [access 2025 Jul 10]. Available from:
https://commission.europa.eu/s....
4.
Castillo YA, Larson A. Attitudes towards people with disabilities: a systematic review of intervention effectiveness. COUNS-EDU: The International Journal of Counseling and Education. 2020; 5(2): 40-57.
https://doi.org/10.23916/00202....
5.
Byrne M, Campos C, Daly S, Lok B, Miles A. The current state of empathy, compassion and person-centred communication training in healthcare: an umbrella review. Patient Education and Counseling. 2024; 119: 108063.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.....
7.
Mussida C, Sciulli D. Disability and employment across Central and Eastern European countries. IZA Journal of Labor & Development. 2016; 5: 4.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40175....
8.
Cieza A, Causey K, Kamenov K, Hanson SW, Chatterji S, Vos T. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet. 2020; 396(10267): 2006-2017.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-....
9.
Baar M, Mladenov T, Titterton M. Rethinking “transition” in Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union through the lens of disability. Problems of Post-Communism. 2025; 72(3): 211-215.
https://doi.org/10.1080/107582....
10.
Pettigrew TF, Tropp LR. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2006; 90(5): 751-783.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3....
11.
Babik I, Gardner ES. Factors affecting the perception of disability: a developmental perspective. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021; 12: 702166.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.....
12.
Weierstall-Pust R, Schnell T, Heßmann P, Feld M, Höfer M, Plate A, Müller MJ. Stressors related to the COVID-19 pandemic, climate change, and the Ukraine crisis, and their impact on stress symptoms in Germany: analysis of cross-sectional survey data. BMC Public Health. 2022; 22: 2233.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889....
13.
Boyle CA, Fox MH, Havercamp SM, Zubler J. The public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic for people with disabilities. Disability and Health Journal. 2020; 13(3): 100943.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo....
15.
Negrini S, Grabljevec K, Boldrini P, Kiekens C, Moslavac S, Zampolini M, et al. Up to 2.2 million people experiencing disability suffer collateral damage each day of COVID-19 lockdown in Europe. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020; 56(3): 361-365.
https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973....
16.
Golyk V, Syvak O, Grabljevec K, Tederko P, Gutenbrunner C, Nugraha B. Five years after development of the national disability, health and rehabilitation plan for Ukraine: achievements and challenges. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2021; 53(3): jrm00160.
https://doi.org/10.2340/165019....
17.
Li Y, Jin Z, Dong G, Zheng R, Wang T. A survey of college students’ willingness to participate in social practice with perceived environmental support based on the applied mixed research method. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022; 13: 972556.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.....
18.
Tomczyszyn D, Pańczuk A, Szepeluk A. [Students’ social attitudes of students towards people with disabilities]. Niepełnosprawność i Rehabilitacja. 2022; 86(2): 33-48 (in Polish).
19.
Tervo RC, Azuma S, Palmer G, Redinius P. Medical students’ attitudes toward persons with disability: a comparative study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2002; 83(11): 1537-1542.
https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2....
20.
Szymanski CF, Bilius M. A case study in the globalization of disability rights: The compatibility of Lithuania’s process for determining the legal incapacity of disabled persons with international legal standards. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics. 2011; 4(1): 83-105.
https://doi.org/10.2478/v10076....
21.
Gulbinė L. Information accessibility for persons with disabilities in Lithuania: regulation, monitoring and economic aspects. Prawo i Więź. 2023; 3(46): 503-530.
https://doi.org/10.36128/PRIW.....
22.
Radlińska I, Kożybska M, Prajzner A, Krzywoszański Ł, Karakiewicz B. Attitudes towards persons with disabilities vs. personality traits of Polish students. Front Psychiatry. 2025; 15: 1477877.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.....
23.
Daszewska A. [Social inclusion of people with disabilities in Poland from the perspective of law, social researchers and Polish society]. Acta Iuris Stetinensis. 2022; 3(39): 23-36 (in Polish).
https://doi.org/10.18276/ais.2....
24.
Lubrańska A, Jezierska B. [Professional activity of disabled people in the context of job satisfaction and quality of life]. Polityka Społeczna. 2022; 577(4): 18-28 (in Polish).
https://doi.org/10.5604/01.300....
25.
Phillips S. “There are No Invalids in the USSR!”: A missing Soviet chapter in the new disability history. Disability Studies Quarterly. 2009; 29(3): 3.
https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v....
26.
Rezanova E. The social policy of Belarus and the development of human potential: Problems and solutions. Eastern Review. 2019; 8: 49-65.
https://doi.org/10.18778/1427-....
27.
Hunt X, Hameed S, Tetali S, Ngoc LA, Ganle J, Huq L, et al. Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to healthcare among people with disabilities: evidence from six low- and middle-income countries. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2023; 22(1): 172.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939....
28.
Oliver M, Barnes C. The new politics of disablement. 2nd edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012.
29.
Gould R, Harris SP. Welfare reform and disability in Slovakia: exploring neoliberalism, social justice and employment policy. Disability Studies Quarterly. 2012; 32(2): 15-26.
https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v....
30.
Danese A, Martsenkovskyi D. Editorial: measuring and buffering the mental health impact of the war in Ukraine in young people. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2023; 62(3): 294-296.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac....
32.
Byra S. [The disability paradox – on the thesis and antithesis]. Niepełnosprawność. Dyskursy Pedagogiki Specjalnej. 2014; 15: 11-28 (in Polish).
33.
Ahmadboukani S, Rostami M. Determinants of students’ attitudes toward people with physical-motor disability. Journal of Practice in Clinical Psychology. 2022; 10(1): 45-54.
https://doi.org/10.32598/jpcp.....
34.
Pfattheicher S, Nockur L, Böhm R, Sassenrath C, Petersen MB. The emotional path to action: empathy promotes physical distancing and wearing of face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychological Science. 2020; 31(11): 1363-1373.
https://doi.org/10.1177/095679....
35.
Rozwadowska E, Krajewska-Kułak E, Guzowski A, Wiśniewska A, Cybulski M. Medical volunteers’ self-analysis of empathic understanding of others. Medycyna Paliatywna/Palliative Medicine. 2012; 4(3): 168-174.
36.
Kliś M. [The adaptive role of empathy in various life situations]. Horyzonty Psychologii. 2012; 2: 147-171 (in Polish).
38.
Węgliński A. [Revised version of the questionnaire on empathic understanding of other people – KRE-II]. In: Wojnarska A, editor. [Rehabilitation diagnostics – selected issues]. Lublin: UMCS; 2010. p. 67-90 (in Polish).
39.
Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1979
https://doi.org/10.4159/978067....
40.
Shakespeare T, Ndagire F, Seketi QE. Triple jeopardy: disabled people and the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet. 2021; 397(10282): 1331-1333.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-....
41.
Waisath W, McCormack M, Stek P, Heymann J. Dismantling barriers and advancing disability-inclusive education: An examination of national laws and policies across 193 countries. International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2024; 28(10): 2088-2103.
https://doi.org/10.1080/136031....
42.
Schuster J, Kolleck N. Disability as a “new” global social theme: the role of international organizations in an expanding global policy field. In: Martens K, Niemann D, Kaasch A, editors. International Organizations in Global Social Governance. Global Dynamics of Social Policy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan; 2021. p. 207-230.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
43.
Gréaux M, Moro MF, Kamenov K, Russell AM, Barrett D, Cieza A. Health equity for persons with disabilities: a global scoping review on barriers and interventions in healthcare services. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2023; 22(1): 236.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939....
44.
Kropp JJ, Wolfe BD. College students’ perceptions on effects of volunteering with adults with developmental disabilities. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement. 2018; 22(3): 93-118.
45.
Kyliushyk I, Jastrzębowska A. Aid attitudes in short- and long-term perspectives among Ukrainian migrants and Poles during the Russian war in 2022. Frontiers in Sociology. 2023; 8: 1084725.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2....
46.
Stępniewski T. [Central and Eastern Europe in the shadow of Russia’s war with Ukraine: geopolitical challenges and security dilemmas]. Lublin: Instytut Europy Środkowej; 2023.
47.
Dodds K, Taylor Z, Akbari A, Broto VC, Detterbeck K, Inverardi-Ferri C, et al. The Russian invasion of Ukraine: implications for politics, territory and governance. Territory, Politics, Governance. 2023; 11(8): 1519-1536.
https://doi.org/10.1080/216226....
48.
Lawry LL, Korona-Bailey J, Hamm TE, Maddox J, Janvrin M, Juman L, et al. A qualitative assessment of war-related rehabilitation needs and gaps in Ukraine. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition. 2025; 44(1): 175.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043....
49.
Van Bavel J, Baicker K, Boggio PS, Capraro V, Cichocka A, Cikara M, et al. Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour. 2020; 4(5): 460-471.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562....
50.
Lund EM, Seekins T. Early exposure to people with physical and sensory disabilities and later attitudes toward social interactions and inclusion. Physical Disabilities: Education and Related Services. 2014; 33(1): 1-16.
https://doi.org/10.14434/pders....
51.
Bilewicz M, Babińska M, Gromova A. High rates of probable PTSD among Ukrainian war refugees: the role of intolerance of uncertainty, loss of control and subsequent discrimination. European Journal of Psychotraumatology. 2024; 15(1): 2394296.
https://doi.org/10.1080/200080....