OTHER / REVIEW PAPER
EPIDEMIOLOGICAL SITUATION OF LYME BORRELIOSIS AND DIAGNOSIS STANDARDS IN POLAND AND UKRAINE
More details
Hide details
1
I. Horbachevsky Ternopil State Medical University, Ukraine
2
Institute of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Pope John Paul II State School of Higher Education
in Biala Podlaska, Poland
3
Institute of Health Sciences, Pope John Paul II State School of Higher Education in Biala Podlaska, Poland
Submission date: 2017-01-25
Acceptance date: 2017-04-07
Publication date: 2017-10-26
Health Prob Civil. 2017;11(3):190-194
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Lyme borreliosis (LB) is the most common tick-borne disease in Europe and the number of cases continues to grow. The aim of the following paper was to present the epidemiological situation and standards of LB diagnosis in the two neighboring countries of Central-Eastern Europe, i.e. Poland and Ukraine.
Lyme borreliosis is considered endemic both in Poland and Ukraine. In Poland, the surveillance system for LB was started in 1996, as the number of LB cases increases systematically. Presently, LB occupies a prominent place amongst occupational diseases. In Ukraine, registration of LB began in 2000, and the incidence of this disease in the country increases each year. At the same time, Ukraine does not officially recognize LB as an occupational disease, which would provide the sick with proper social guarantees.
Poland has available recommendations issued by the Polish Society of Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases for diagnosis and treatment of LB. In turn, common recommendations for methods of diagnosis and treatment of LB in Ukraine are still missing. In the absence of any guidelines on laboratory diagnostics of LB in Ukraine, some serious efforts should be made to harmonize standards in the diagnosis of Lyme disease in this country, which could be based on the guidelines in force in European countries.
REFERENCES (14)
1.
Lyme borreliosis in Europe. WHO Regional Office for Europe. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). [cited 2016 Oct 12]. Available from:
http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/healt....
2.
Lindgren E, Jaenson TGT. Lyme borreliosis in Europe: influences of climate and climate change, epidemiology, ecology and adaptation measures. WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2006. [cited 2016 Oct 12] Available from:
http://www.euro.who.int/__data....
3.
Medlock JM, Hansford KM, Bormane A, Derdakova M, Estrada-Pena A, George JC, et al. Driving forces for changes in geographical distribution of Ixodes ricinus ticks in Europe. Parasites & Vectors. 2013; 6(1). [cited 2016 Nov 27] Available from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p...- 1.pdf.
4.
Stefanoff P, Rosińska M, Zieliński A. Epidemiology of tick-borne diseases in Poland. Przegl Epidemiol. 2006; 60(Suppl. 1): 151-159 (in Polish).
6.
Paradowska-Stankiewicz I, Chrześcijańska I. Lyme disease in Poland in 2014. Przegl Epidemiol. 2016; 70(3): 395-398.
8.
Shkilna M. Lyme borreliosis in forestry workers of Ternopil region. Infectious diseases. 2016; 1(83): 36-40.
9.
Fedonyuk L, Chaban G. Rybitska L, Avsyukevich OC. Epidemiological characteristic, clinical and diagnostic peculiarities of the systemic tick-borne Lyme in Ternopil region. Taurian Medical and Biology Journal. 2013; 1(16): 198-202.
11.
Szeszenia-Dąbrowska N, Wilczyńska U. Occupational diseases in Poland, 2014. Med Pr. 2016; 67(3): 327-335 (in Polish).
12.
Andreychyn M. Lyme borreliosis. In: M. Andreychyn, N. Vasylieva, V. Kopcha. Professional infectious diseases. Kyiv: Avicenna; 2014. p. 406-419.
13.
Pancewicz SA, Garlicki AM, Moniuszko-Malinowska A, Zajkowska J, Kondrusik M, Grygorczuk S, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of tick-borne diseases recommendations of the Polish Society of Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases. Przegl Epidemiol. 2015; 69: 309-316.
14.
Pancewicz SA. Lyme disease − principles of diagnosis and treatment. Pediatr Med Rodz. 2014; 10(2): 163-173.