ZOONOZIS - VECTOR-BORNE DISEASES / RESEARCH PAPER
RISK OF TICK-BORNE BACTERIAL DISEASES IN FORESTRY WORKERS OF TERNOPIL REGION (WESTERN UKRAINE)
More details
Hide details
1
I. Horbachevsky Ternopil State Medical University, Ukraine
Publication date: 2017-07-28
Health Prob Civil. 2017;11(2):93-98
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Background. The aim of the study was to evaluate the awareness of Lyme borreliosis
prevention and risk of being infected with the Borrelia burgdorferi in the forestry workers of
Ternopil Region. To achieve the objective, serological tests were performed.
Material and methods. The studies were conducted by diagnosing serum in 348 employees
of Ternopil Region for anti-Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. antibodies by ELISA test. The age of
the examined persons ranged from 17 to 75, mean age - 38.9 years. All the participants
completed а questionnaire. The forestry workers were asked to state whether they noticed
any symptoms compatible with Lyme borreliosis.
Results. 348 forestry workers employed in five forest inspectorates were examined for
specific anti-Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. antibodies. With ELISA test, a positive or inconclusive
result in at least one antibody was observed in 43.1% of the respondents (n=150 of 348): IgM
antibody − in 14.6% (n=51 of 348), and IgG antibody – in 35.3% (n=123 of 348). The largest
number of respondents in the study group, i.e. 35.3%, were bitten in the abdomen area. As
for the methods of tick removal, most respondents pulled the tick out with fingers (35.9%),
while only 6.0% turned to a physician or nurse to have it removed. Erythema migrans (47%)
and pruritis (31%) were the most frequent symptoms among the participants.
Conclusions. T he absence of t he official r ecognition of Lyme b orreliosis a s a n o ccupational
disease in Ukraine makes the study of prevention measures and their distribution in professional
groups working in wooded areas an urgent matter. Providing the forest administration units
with a sufficient number of tweezers or special loops for tick removal would certainly increase
the protection of those exploiting forests against work-related tick-borne diseases.
REFERENCES (31)
1.
Geller J, Nazarova L, Katargina O, Golovljova I. Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato prevalence in tick populations.
2.
in Estonia. Parasit Vectors. 2013, 9(6): 202.
3.
Lunemann JD, Zarmas S, Priem S, Franz J, Zschenderlein R, Aberer E, Klein R, Schouls L, Burmester GR,.
4.
Krause A. Rapid typing of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato species in specimens from patients with different.
5.
manifestations of Lyme borreliosis. J Clin Microbiol 2001, 39: 1130-1133.
6.
Andreychyn M. Lyme borreliosis. In: Andreychyn M, Vasylieva N, Kopcha V. Professional infectious diseases.
7.
Kyiv: Avicenna; 2014. p. 406-419.
10.
Shkilna M. Lyme borreliosis in forestry workers of Ternopil region. Infectious Diseases. 2016; 1(83): 36-40.
11.
Pańczuk A, Kozioł-Montewka M, Tokarska-Rodak M. Exposure to ticks and seroprevalence of Borrelia.
12.
burgdorferi among a healthy young population living in the area of southern Podlasie, Poland. Ann Agric.
13.
Environ Med 2014, 21: 512-517.
14.
Kondrusik M, Grygorczuk S, Skotarczak B, Wodecka B, Rymaszewska A, Pancewicz S, et al. Molecular.
15.
and serological diagnosis of the Borrelia burgdorferi infection among patients with diagnosed erythema.
16.
migrans. Ann Agric Environ Med 2007, 14: 209-213.
17.
Cisak E, Chmielewska-Badora J, Zwoliński J, Wójcik-Fatla A, Polak J, Dutkiewicz J. Risk of tick-borne bacterial diseases among workers of Roztocze National Park (southeastern Poland). Ann Agric Environ Med 2005, 12: 127-132.
18.
Dobracki W, Dobracka B, Paczosa W, Zięba J, Bereś P: Epidemiology of borreliosis in workers of the district.
19.
forestry offices in Lower Silesia. Przegl Epidemiol 2007, 61(2): 385-391 (in Polish).
20.
Oehme R, Hartelt K, Backe H, Brockmann S, Kimmig P. Foci of tick-borne diseases in southwest Germany. Int.
21.
J Med Microbiol. 2002, 33:22-9.
22.
Bazovska S, Machacova E, Spalekova M, Kontrosova S. Reported incidence of Lyme disease in Slovakia and.
23.
antibodies to B. burgdorferi antigens detected in healthy population. Bratisl Lek Listy 2005, 106: 270-273.
24.
Thorin C, Rigaud E, Capek I, André-Fontaine G, Oster B, Gastinger G, et al. Seroprevalence of Lyme borreliosis and tick-borne encephalitis in workers at risk, in Eastern France. Med Mal Infect 2008, 38(10): 533-542 (in French).
25.
Bartosik K, Kubrak T, Olszewski T, Jung M, Buczek A. Prevention of tick bites and protection against tickborne.
26.
diseases in south-eastern Poland. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2008; 15: 181–185.
27.
Slimību profilakses un kontroles centrs. Informācija un ieteikumi izglītības iestādēm ērču pārnesto.
30.
Dybowska D, Kozielewicz D, Abdulgater A. Rozpowszechnienie boreliozy wśród pracowników lasów.
31.
województwa kujawsko-pomorskiego. Rev Epidemiol. 2007; 61: 67–71 (in Polish).