ZOONOZIS - VECTOR-BORNE DISEASES / RESEARCH PAPER
KNOWLEDGE IN THE PREVENTION OF LYME BORRELIOSIS AND EXPOSURE TO TICKS IN WOMEN AND MEN STUDYING NON-MEDICAL COURSES IN LATVIA
 
More details
Hide details
1
Riga Medical College of the University of Latvia
 
2
Riga Teacher Training and Education Management Academy, Latvia
 
3
Institute of Health Sciences, Pope John Paul II State School of Higher Education in Biala Podlaska, Poland
 
4
Institute of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Pope John Paul II State School of Higher Education in Biala Podlaska, Poland
 
 
Publication date: 2017-07-28
 
 
Health Prob Civil. 2017;11(2):103-108
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT

Background. The aim of the following study was to assess the level of knowledge in the
prevention of Lyme borreliosis and exposure to ticks in non-medical students, broken down
by gender.

Material and methods. The study group comprised 274 students from Latvia, including
229 women and 45 men aged 18-35. As for the research tool, the authors’ own questionnaire
survey was used.

Results. Latvian male students are more likely to use repellents and more often examine
their bodies on return from green areas (86.6% and 97.8% respectively) than women (66.3%
and 93.9%, respectively). The biggest group of the respondents (35.6% of the men and 41.1%
of the women) considered that twisting the tick out with tweezers was the correct method
of removing ticks. Slightly fewer respondents, i.e. 26.6% of the men and 36.2% of the women,
opted for tweezing it out with a swift steady movement. In practice, most people do not do
this on their own − 28.9% of the men turn to a doctor / nurse for help and 32.3% of the women
to some other person. Students critically assess their knowledge regarding Lyme borreliosis:
60% of the men evaluate it as minimal and 53.1% of the women as average. More than 86% of
the men and 73.4% of the women in the study group reported being bitten by a tick.

Conclusions: The results of the study reflect the attitudes of Latvian academic youth towards
Lyme borreliosis as well as knowledge about the disease and its prevention, which allows for
assessing the need for intensifying public education in the subject.
REFERENCES (33)
1.
Krūmiņa A, Vasiļjeva G, Lucenko I, Karelis G, Logina I. Laimborelioze: Literatūras un starptautisko vadlīniju.
 
2.
apskats. Doctus. 2013; 8: 10–14 (in Lithuanian).
 
3.
Slimību profilakses un kontroles centrs. Informācija un ieteikumi izglītības iestādēm ērču pārnesto.
 
4.
slimību profilaksei. [cited 07 June 2017]. Available from: http://www.spkc.gov.lv/ieteiku....
 
5.
(in Lithuanian).
 
6.
Vingre I. Biežākās kļūdas Laimas slimības diagnostikā un ārstēšanā. Latvijas Ārstu Žurnāls. 1999; 4: 24-25.
 
7.
Mazjānis I, Tirāns E. Laimas slimība. Jums, Kolēģi. 2004; 6: 31-34 (in Lithuanian).
 
8.
Mazjānis I, Tirāns E. Infekcijas slimības (2.izd.). Rīga: autorizdevums. 2006; 1008 lpp (in Lithuanian).
 
9.
Rizzoli A, Silaghi C, Obiegala A, Rudolf I, Hubálek Z, Földvári G, et al. Ixodes ricinus and its transmitted.
 
10.
pathogens in urban and peri-urban areas in Europe: new hazards and relevance for public health. Front.
 
11.
Public Health. 2014, 1;2:251. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00251. [cited 07 June 2017]. Available from: http://.
 
12.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4248671/.
 
13.
Nejezchlebova H, Kiewra D, Žákovská A, Ovesná P. Students’ attitudes to tick risks. Ann Agric Environ Med.
 
14.
2016; 23(3): 437-41.
 
15.
Deutsche Borreliose-Gesellschaft e. V. Diagnosis and Treatment of Lyme borreliosis Guidelines of the German.
 
16.
Borreliosis Society. 2010; [cited 07 June 2017]. Available from: http://www.borreliose-gesellsc....
 
17.
Texte/guidelines.pdf.
 
18.
Rīgas Austrumu slimnīcas infektologi: Ērču aktivitātes sezona ir sākusies [tiešsaite]. [cited 2015 Mar.
 
19.
. Available from: https://www.aslimnica.lv/lv/co... (in Lithuanian).
 
20.
Pańczuk A, Kozioł-Montewka M, Tokarska-Rodak M. Wiedza na temat boreliozy oraz podejmowanie działań.
 
21.
profilaktycznych wśród studentów Państwowej Szkoły Wyższej w Białej Podlaskiej. In: Tokarska-Rodak M,.
 
22.
Markert R, editors. Społeczne, środowiskowe i biologiczne zagrożenia zdrowia a kształtowanie zachowań.
 
23.
prozdrowotnych. Biała Podlaska: Wydawnictwo PSW JPII; 2014. p. 155-165 (in Polish).
 
24.
Bartosik K, Sitarz M, Szymańska J, Buczek A. Tick bites on humans in the agricultural and recreational areas.
 
25.
in south-eastern Poland. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2011; 18: 151-157.
 
26.
Pańczuk A, Kozioł-Montewka M, Tokarska-Rodak M. Exposure to ticks and seroprevalence of Borrelia.
 
27.
burgdorferi among a healthy young population living in the area of southern Podlasie, Poland. Ann Agric.
 
28.
Environ Med. 2014; 21(3): 512-517.
 
29.
Cook MJ. Lyme borreliosis:a review of data on transmission time after tick attachment. International Journal.
 
30.
of General Medicine. 2014; 8: 1-8.
 
31.
Kowalczyk A, Kozłowska E, Pacian A, Skórzyńska H. Świadomość studentów na temat występowania i.
 
32.
żerowania kleszy w Polsce. Journal of Education, Health and Sport. 2015; 5(9): 469-480.
 
33.
Kurnatowski P, Warpechowska M, Kurnatowska AJ. Knowledge on Lyme disease among foresters. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2011; 24(1): 78–93.
 
eISSN:2354-0265
ISSN:2353-6942
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top