RESEARCH PAPER
Quality of life, disease acceptance, and psychosocial functioning in colorectal cancer patients with colostomy: a cross-sectional study
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
 
2
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Public Health in Bytom, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
 
3
Institute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Poland
 
4
Department of Health Sciences, Jan Dlugosz University of Humanities and Natural Sciences, Czestochowa, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2026-03-16
 
 
Final revision date: 2026-04-20
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-04-23
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-05-04
 
 
Corresponding author
Tomasz Jurys   

Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Ziołowa 45/47 Street, 40-635 Katowice, Poland
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
Permanent colostomy after colorectal cancer surgery constitutes a major life change that may influence patients’ physical, psychological, and social well-being. This study aimed to evaluate these outcomes in patients with a permanent colostomy and to explore differences according to age, gender, and place of residence.

Material and methods:
The study included 150 adult patients with a permanent colostomy following colorectal cancer treatment. Participants were recruited during oncological follow-up visits in Poland. Quality of life was measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire – Brief Version (WHOQoL-BREF), illness acceptance using the Acceptance of Illness Scale (AIS), and psychosocial functioning using an author-designed questionnaire. Sociodemographic variables included age, gender, and place of residence. Statistical analyses were performed using independent-sample t-tests and analysis of variance with a significance level of p<0.05.

Results:
Older participants demonstrated significantly higher quality of life, greater illness acceptance, and better psychosocial functioning than younger patients. Men reported higher quality of life and illness acceptance than women, while psychosocial functioning did not differ significantly by gender. Urban residents achieved significantly higher scores across all assessed domains compared with rural residents.

Conclusions:
Sociodemographic factors significantly influence adaptation to life with a permanent colostomy. Younger patients, women, and individuals living in rural areas may require additional psychosocial support and targeted interventions.
REFERENCES (31)
1.
Shi Y, Yu H, Wang L, Zhang H. Acceptance and commitment therapy combined with usual care improves psychosocial outcomes and reduces complications in patients with permanent colostomies after colorectal cancer surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Front Surg. 2025; 12: 1693290. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.....
 
2.
Lau J, Ng A, Koh WL, Peh CH, The Singapore Colorectal Cancer Research Group, Luo N, et al. Associations between ostomy creation and health-related quality of life in colorectal cancer patients: a longitudinal observational study. Cancer Med. 2025; 14(23): e71388. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.7....
 
3.
Sandberg S, Asplund D, Bock D, Ehrencrona C, Ohlsson B, Park J, et al. Predicting life with a permanent end colostomy: a prospective study on function, bother and acceptance. Colorectal Dis. 2021; 23(10): 2681-2689. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.1....
 
4.
Yeniğün Akbulut SC, Ilgaz A. Psychosocial effects and quality of life after stoma surgery: systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. BMC Psychol. 2026; 14: 315. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359....
 
5.
Lupo R, Rubbi I, Barletta A, Mele C, Lezzi A, Triglia C, et al. Quality of life and psychophysical consequences in individuals with intestinal stoma: an observational study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025; 22(9): 1327. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph....
 
6.
Aker FZ, Karazeybek E. Relationship between perceived social support and stoma self-efficacy in permanent colostomy patients: a correlational study. J Eval Clin Pract. 2025; 31(1): e14117. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14....
 
7.
Shin J, Yan G, Gibson JS, Jones RA, Gray M, Debnam KJ. Ostomy leakage, odor, and peristomal skin complications as predictors of anxiety symptoms in colorectal cancer survivors: a cross-sectional study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2025; 52(6): 476-484. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.00....
 
8.
Brady RRW, Sheard D, Howard K, Vestergaard M, Boisen EB, Mather R, et al. The prevalence of leakage, peristomal skin complications and impact on quality of life in the first year following stoma surgery. Nurs Rep. 2025; 15(3): 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursre....
 
9.
Açil HC, Yilmaz AÇ, Aygin D. The effect of recovery status and life conditions on the quality of life in colorectal cancer patients with stoma: a path analysis. Front Psychol. 2025; 16: 1693626. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.....
 
10.
Li G, Qin R, Zhao X, Junyan D, Li P. Adaptation to colorectal cancer and ostomy: Psychological flexibility mitigates loneliness associated with social withdrawal. Support Care Cancer. 2025; 33: 950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520....
 
11.
Afiyanti Y, Milanti A, Wahidi KR, Fitch M. Embracing my stoma: psychosocial adjustment of Indonesian colorectal cancer survivors living with a stoma. Cancer Nurs. 2025; 48(2): E121-E128. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.00....
 
12.
Karahan A, Çıtak EA, Çevik B, Abbasoğlu A, Uğurlu Z. Determining the perception of stigma of individuals with ostomies. BMC Psychol. 2025; 13: 767. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359....
 
13.
Li G, He X, Qin R, Yao Q, Dong X, Li P. Linking stigma to social isolation among colorectal cancer survivors with permanent stomas: the chain mediating roles of stoma acceptance and valuable actions. J Cancer Surviv. 2025; 19: 2037-2046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764....
 
14.
Doucette JE, Mawn BE, Beitz JM, Koren A. Factors affecting psychosocial adjustment in persons with a recent ostomy. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2023; 50(4): 297-306. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.00....
 
15.
Xavier SSdM, Medeiros LPd, Lima Neto AVd, Silva IPd, Lucena SKP, Oliveira ACdS, et al. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of people with ostomy and the adaptive domains of Roy’s theory: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2024; 19(4): e0302036. https://doi.org/10.1371/journa....
 
16.
Burr DA, Castrellon JJ, Zald DH, Samanez-Larkin GR. Emotion dynamics across adulthood in everyday life: older adults are more emotionally stable and better at regulating desires. Emotion. 2021; 21(3): 453-464. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo000....
 
17.
Fischer M, Büntzel J, Hübner J. Social and psychological effects of a stoma on the sexuality and self-image of patients. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2026; 41: 39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384....
 
18.
Xian H, Zhang Y, Yang Y, Zhang X, Wang X. A descriptive, cross-sectional study among Chinese patients to identify factors that affect psychosocial adjustment to an enterostomy. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2018; 64(7): 8-17. https://doi.org/10.25270/owm.2....
 
19.
Ketterer SN, Leach MJ, Fraser C. Factors associated with quality of life among people living with a stoma in nonmetropolitan areas. Nurs Res. 2021; 70(4): 281-288. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.00....
 
20.
Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O’Connell KA. The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A Report from the WHOQOL Group. Qual Life Res. 2004; 13: 299-310. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QURE....
 
21.
Jaracz K, Kalfoss M, Górna K, Baczyk G. Quality of life in Polish respondents: Psychometric properties of the Polish WHOQOL-BREF. Scand J Caring Sci. 2006; 20(3): 251-260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471....
 
22.
Czerw A, Religioni U, Szumilas P, Sygit K, Partyka O, Mękal D, et al. Normalization of the AIS (Acceptance of Illness Scale) questionnaire and the possibility of its use among cancer patients. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2022; 29(2): 269-273. https://doi.org/10.26444/aaem/....
 
23.
Mazurek J, Lurbiecki J. [Acceptance of illness scale and its clinical impact]. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2014; 36(212): 106-108 (in Polish).
 
24.
Felton BJ, Revenson TA, Hinrichsen GA. Stress and coping in the explanation of psychological adjustment among chronically ill adults. Soc Sci Med. 1984; 18(10): 889-898. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9....
 
25.
Goulia P, Papadimitriou I, Machado MO, Mantas C, Pappa C, Tsianos E, et al. Does psychological distress vary between younger and older adults in health and disease?. J Psychosom Res. 2012; 72(2): 120-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsy....
 
26.
Kohn JN, Jester DJ, Dilmore AH, Thomas ML, Daly R, Jeste DV. Trends, heterogeneity, and correlates of mental health and psychosocial well-being in later life: study of 590 community-dwelling adults aged 40-104 years. Aging Ment Health. 2023; 27(6): 1198-1207. https://doi.org/10.1080/136078....
 
27.
Shabani M, Taheri-Kharameh Z, Saghafipour A, Ahmari-Tehran H, Yoosefee S, Amini-Tehrani M. Resilience and spirituality mediate anxiety and life satisfaction in chronically ill older adults. BMC Psychol. 2023; 11: 256. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359....
 
28.
Brown H, Randle J. Living with a stoma: a review of the literature. J Clin Nurs. 2005; 14(1): 74-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365....
 
29.
Redeker C, Grunfeld E, Miles A. The impact of an ostomy on body image and sexual function of patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychooncology. 2025; 34(8): e70249. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70....
 
30.
Beaubrun En Famille Diant L, Sordes F, Chaubard T. [Psychological impact of ostomy on the quality of life of colorectal cancer patients: role of body image, self-esteem and anxiety]. Bull Cancer. 2018; 105(6): 573-580 (in French). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulc....
 
31.
Zhou J, Wang Z, Chen X, Li Q. Gender differences in psychosocial outcomes and coping strategies of patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Healthcare. 2023; 11(18): 2591. https://doi.org/10.3390/health....
 
eISSN:2354-0265
ISSN:2353-6942
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top