ZOONOZIS - VECTOR-BORNE DISEASES / REVIEW PAPER
LYME BORRELIOSIS AS A CURRENT HEALTH PROBLEM OF THE 21ST CENTURY
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin, Poland
2
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin, Poland
(Public Health student)
Publication date: 2017-07-28
Health Prob Civil. 2017;11(2):66-70
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The aim of the paper is to present the current epidemiological situation of Lyme borreliosis in
Poland as compared to the past years, with particular regard to Lublin Province. According to
the Department of Epidemiology, Laboratory of Monitoring and Epidemiological Analysis, the
National Institute of Public Health – National Institute of Hygiene (NIPH – NIH), the number
of cases of Lyme borreliosis reported for surveillance has increased significantly in the past
three years. In 2016, the number stood at 21 220, i.e. 36% more than in 2015. The assessment
of safety and sanitation standards conducted by State Sanitary Inspection for the year 2015
in Lublin Province showed that the incidence of Lyme borreliosis was 50.9 and that it was
higher than the incidence in Poland – 35.4. Lyme borreliosis is a serious epidemiological and
clinical problem in occupational risk groups, i.e. people working in agriculture, forestry and
hunting. In serological surveys carried out in Lublin Province in the years 2011-2014, there
was a much higher percentage of positive results in workers of several forest inspectorates
than in those doing physical work related to forest exploitation (41.0%), as compared to the
administrative staff (21.4%).
REFERENCES (26)
1.
Ocena stanu zdrowia oraz określenie potrzeb zdrowotnych mieszkańców województwa lubelskiego na.
2.
potrzeby opracowywania programów polityki zdrowotnej realizowanych przez Samorząd Województwa.
4.
Paradowska-Stankiewicz I, Chrześcijańska I. Lyme disease in Poland in 2014. Przegl Epidemiol. 2016; 70(3):.
6.
Zajkowska JM, Dunaj J. Borelioza z Lyme. Diagnostyka laboratoryjna, trudności i wyzwania Lyme borreliosis.
7.
Challenges and difficulties of laboratory diagnosis, Forum Zakażeń. 2013; 4(4): 223.
8.
Wilczyńska U, Sobala W, Szeszenia-Dąbrowska N. Choroby zawodowe stwierdzone w Polsce w 2012 r. Med.
10.
Choroby zakaźne i zatrucia w Polsce. Narodowy Instytut Zdrowia Publicznego –Państwowy Zakład Higieny.
11.
[cited 2017 Apr 25]. Available from: www.pzh.gov.pl (in Polish).
12.
Ocena stanu bezpieczeństwa sanitarnego województwa lubelskiego za rok 2015. - Państwowa Inspekcja.
14.
userfiles/file/strglowna/OSBSWL_ZA_2015.pdf (in Polish).
15.
Cisak E, Wójcik-Fatla A, Zając V, Dutkiewicz J. Prevalence of tick-borne pathogens at various workplaces in.
16.
forest exploitation environment. Medycyna Pracy. 2014; 65(5): 575-81.
17.
Muraczyńska B, Gałęziowska E. Kontrowersje związane z diagnozą i leczeniem boreliozy na świecie.
18.
Medycyna Ogólna i Nauki o Zdrowiu. 2015; 21(4): 372–377 (in Polish).
19.
Kocbach PP, Kocbach BP. Ocena częstości występowania boreliozy wśród pracowników leśnictwa. Prevalence of lyme disease among forestry workers. Medycyna Pracy. 2014; 65(3): 335–341.
20.
Stanek G, Fingerle V, Hunfeld KP et al. Lyme borreliosis: clinical case definitions for diagnosis and management in Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011; 17(1): 69–79.
21.
Pancewicz SA. Borelioza z Lyme – zasady rozpoznawania i leczenia. Lyme disease – principles of diagnosis.
22.
and treatment. Pediatr Med Rodz. 2014; 10(2): 163–173.
23.
Moniuszko A, Pancewicz S, Czupryna P, Dunaj J, Guziejko K, Zajkowska J. Erythema migrans jako patognomoniczny objaw choroby z Lyme. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2013; 35: 230–232 (in Polish).
24.
Raphael B, Stricker L, Johnson L. Lyme disease: the next decade. Infet Drug Resist. 2011; 4: 1–9.
25.
Rajewski P, Rajewski P, Waleśkiewicz-Ogórek K. Borelioza – opis przypadku. Forum Medycyny Rodzinnej.
26.
2014; 8(4): 185-189 (in Polish).Legatowicz-Koprowska M, Walczak E. Borelioza – wciąż trudne wyzwanie. Forum Medycyny Rodzinnej. 2011; 5(4): 336-344 (in Polish).